To
front page.
A Hyper Electromagnetics Model
For
Quasi Quantum Computers
Table of Contents
Part A
Introduction
Report Summary
A Basic Model
Experiment A: Linux Server And
AMD Anthlon Computer Tests
Part B
Experiment B:
Speed fs Tests On Other Commercial Computers
Experiment C:
Decade Counters As A Hypertronic Circuit,
Experiment D: Testing
The eZ8 Microcontroller Calculation Speed,
Uncertain
Experiment E: Test Circuit With The Z180 Microprocessor.
Part C
Experiment F: Testing the Z80 Microprocessor
Experiment G: Testing The Speed Of The 8085
Microprocessor
Quantized Time And Hypertime Model Part C,
(Requires a password. Not available.)
Part E
Part F
Conclusion
Reference Texts
Word Glossary.
Introduction
In the past we considered the measurement of
time using a clock as imaginary. Time flow rate would be the same
throughout the universe. Time was just a number on a clock or a day on a
calender. Time passing could be measured with a clock, but time did not have
physical properties of its own. With Einstein's theory of relativity, the rate
of time flow in different regions of space did not have to be the
same. Atoms traveling at fast speeds in space would have
a slower time flow rate than stationary atoms. Time appears now to be
physical and not just an imaginary unit of time. Time is now not just
an imaginary sensation, but is a physical object that could be altered.
When we exist and move through time there may by billions or trillions of
moments of time in one second that exist in a six dimensional universe. A
second of time could be divided into smaller moments of
time. Physical time may consists of moments of time sections or parts. We
can compare a small moment of time of a small region of three dimensional
space as a picture frame of a motion picture film roll. Each picture frame may
represent a single snap shot of a moment of a portion of
the universe. As the film advances in the movie projector we can see
the moving image of the movie. There may be N= trillions of moments of
time frames in one second. Then the smallest moment of time in three
dimensional space is 1/N. These subdivisions of time is quantized
time, quantumized time or segmented time. The regions of three dimensional
space times exists as packets of moments 4 as depicted in figure 2,
and not as a steady continuous stream of time flow. An electron -e would jump
from present to a future moment through hyperspace outside the region of moment
4 in figure 2. A real electron -e would only exists as a mass in a moment of
three dimensional time like moment 4. This quantized time and hypertime model
may be a variation of the quantum time model. If there are oscillations of
charged masses like electrons that last shorter than 1/N, then time may
not be measurable using mass like a neutron in a local three dimensional
space-time. In between moments of time like 4, the electron may exist as a
virtual electron. The electron jumps from moment to moment t3,Di,
and during this jump it may exist in local hyperspace and hypertime. Like in a
motion film recording, if the vibrations of on object like a baseball in the
movie is moving to fast, we cannot see and measure the speed of the ball
accurately during certain small moments of time. This scientific
model of quantized time and hypertime may not even be a model, but is just
a thought at this time. When experimenting with time related machines, the
observation of the experiment by the experimenter may affect the experiment
results. An electron -e takes an imaginary path 2 through ordinary four
dimensional time t3Di of three dimensional space and also
through hypertime t4Di that exists in and between ordinary
moments of time 4. Motion speeds 5 in hypertime and local hyperspace of
electron -e or virtual may be accelerated (red motion paths), but since we
cannot normally detect this acceleration, electron motion and human aging in
three dimensional space-time occurs at a normal rate.
Electron
In Two Dimensions of Time t3Di and t4Di
Figure 2.
Quantumed time simply means that each moment of time exists only for a brief
moment in time and that there are a finite amount of such moments of time per
second of ordinary time. Such a short moment of time is t3Di
. Evidence may seem to be the quasi quantum computers emntioned later.
The concept of the quantum computer in conventional science may have
first been made by physicist Rolf Landauer around 1960s in recorded
history. He came with the idea that computation in mathematics was an abstract
process of mathematical ideas than the physics of machines. The concept of
quantum computing was further developed by physicist David Deutsch in
1970s. The concept of the quantum computer may have been adopted by
science and makes conventional science seem less boring and less trivial.
February 2007. Section last updated: February 26, 2008.
Report Summary
A Basic Model
Hypertime Time Dimension
Ordinary time in three dimensional space is symbolized by t3Di.
Fast frequency electrical currents may perhaps also partially exists in
hypertime or hyperspace since hyperspace is a subspace where ordinary three
dimensional space-time may be embedded in. Electrical
oscillations with frequency f may speed up when in temporary in
hypertime toward an electrical frequency of fs . If
electrical oscillations per second are faster than the normal speed of time N,
then the electrical oscillations must exists in hypertime t4Di
if this quantized time model exists. The t4Di is time
in another time dimensions if it exists. The three dimensional space
time t3Di range considered is:
{t3Di | -1 second< t3Di< +1 second}.
Hypertime t4Di time flow rate or speed is perhaps indefinite.
Hypertime t4Di=t3Di2, or t4Di=t3Din
. The faster the electrical oscillations 3 in figure 2, the more the
oscillation is within hypertime t4Di, and the larger the
affects of hypertime on the electron -e. Hypertime immersed computer means
that the computer or electricity in the computer exists partially in
hypertime along with existing in normal time.
Let Pi(xi, yi,
zi, t3Di, t4Di, Ui)
a point at the centre of an ith electron if an electric current inside a
computer. Point Pi(xi, yi,
zi, t3Di, t4Di, Ui)
existing in a local seven dimensional space-time moves with the electron.
Hyper electromagnetics is simply electromagnetic mathematics in six or seven
dimensions where an single electromagnetic particle, light photon or an
electron may be located by a point
Pi(xi, yi, zi,
t3Di, t4Di, Ui) on and
moving with the particle. Variables xi, yi,
and zi are the three dimensional spacial coordinate locations
of point Pi relative to an arbitrarily chosen point on
earth at a moment of time t3Di. Variable t4Di
is hypertime or hypertime fourth dimensional value, and ordinary time
flow t3Di is in the fourth dimension also. Variable Ui
is a universe number that can represent our universe or a parallel universe.
For examples: t4Di=10-14 second in hypertime
equals t3Di=(t4Di)1/2=10-6
second in real ordinary time; xi=yi=zi=100
metres, t3Di=10-7 second, Ui=universe
2, t3Di=(t4Di)1/2, i=electron 4,
for t3Di<∆tmax =10-7 S. The
maximum required electric pulse width is ∆tmax .
The n=2, or n= 3. The n can be a positive integer from 2 to 200,
which increases as t3Di reduces. A quantized
moment of time of t3Di the smallest moment of time in
three dimensional space-time may perhaps be only divided as smaller
moments 5 of hypertime t4Di of figure 2. The t3Di
may be a succession of temporal quanta or moments of time. Temporal quanta is
defined by others as a period of time. One moment of time would be
the smallest moment of time 1/N in three dimensional space-time. Since
time may be quantized the position of a small object like an electron cannot
be accurately located as its velocity increases as it jumps from
one moment of time to the next. A quantized moment of time or segment
of time would have a limited duration in time of t3Di= 1
moment of time. Hyperspace or hypertime t4Di may exist
between the quantized moments of time as shown in previous figure
2. Assume that the linear velocity of an electron in a vacuum is
v and the smallest time duration of three dimensional space is dt3Di=1
chronon in equation: v=ds/dt3Di.
Then the smallest distance that we can measure that the electron has
traveled is ds. Within length ds the electron may partially exist in hypertime
t4Di and in its local hyperspace. For examples: v=10-4
metres/second,
10-50 S.<dt3Di<10-85 second. The
electron would perhaps teleport is it travels in hyperspace within small
length ds. If we could measure v and ds with an
experimental device, we may be able to find dt3Di .
In quantum mechanics field of study, a light particle like a
photon may appear to be at more than one location at the same time.
Electrons may be located at more than one location in an electric current
at the same time. In the page "
Linear Acceleration Of A Mass " there
is a mass acceleration model equation: ai=(Fi/mi)vi1/2,
where ai is the linear acceleration of the mass mi, mi
is the mass of the electron , vi is the electron's velocity
in same direction as ai, and Fi is the
acceleration force on mi in same direction as ai.
This fast acceleration ai may make the electron appear as it
were in more than one location at the same time. Electrons may be located at
two or more locations at the same time; the electron may be located at point (xi,
yi, zi) and location (xi,j,
yi,j, zi,j). For this can modify point Pi
by adding a hyper space vector dimensions Hi,j
for the ith electron at location j. The point Pi becomes:
Pi(xi, yi, zi,
Hi,j, t3Di, t4Di,
Ui)
in 8 dimensions. A Cartesian coordinate system of seven dimensions of a region
of space-time Hi,j is shown in figure
2b. It shows parallel universe Ui=universe 1 and Ui=
universe 2 graphs with these number chosen arbitrarily. In this case x=xi,
y=yi, z=zi are placed
an a single axis, because we have a difficulty in imagining 7 dimensions in
space.
A Seven Dimensional Cartesian
Coordinate System.
Figure 2b.
Point Pi displacement magnitude: ||si||=(xi2+yi2+
zi2)1/2=si.
Then other location of subatomic particle is:
(xi,j, yi,j, zi,j)=(xi,
yi, zi)+Hi,j=(xi+Hxi,j,
yi+Hyi,j, zi+Hzi,j);
xi,j=xi+Hxi,j;
Hi,j=(Hxi,j, Hyi,j,
Hzi,j );
||Hi,j||=(Hxi,j2
+ Hyi,j2 + Hzi,j2)1/2;
||si,j||=(xi,j2+ yi,j2+
zi,j2)1/2.
The appearance of the same particle at two different locations at the same time
is called superposition. Superposition enables electrons to appear to exists in
hypertime t4Di. Time flow rate in hypertime may be faster
than normal three dimensional time t3Di. For example, if we
could place a miniature television camera in hypertime and watch normal
time t3Di, we could see 0.01 second=t3Di of
normal time pass by while time1 second=t4Di of elapsed time
by the camera in hypertime went by. The time dt4Di for the electron
to travel distance Hi,j is small such that
0.0 S.<dt4Di<10-10000 S. Then the
instantaneous velocity of the electron is:
vi,j=Hi,j/dt4Di,
(10); fs=vi,j c,
(11).
Figure 2c.
Hyper electronic computer circuits may operate at very fast apparent speeds fs.
Such a model may help describe fast hyper electronic circuits . There are also
other scientific models for hyper electronic operation related to the above
electromagnetic model. These models would be based on the apparent experimental
evidence if the experimental evidence was true.
Superposition In Space
Imagine an electron -e taking a circular path 2 in a magnetic field
with magnetic field intensity B as shown in figure 3. The electron
can be at position 3 at a particular time t3Di. The electron
is in superposition when it is at position 3 and position 4 at the same time t3Di
on circular path 2 with radius rc . Then Hi,j/rc
can be the angular position difference of the electron in position 3 and 4. The
angular distance between positions 3 and 4 of electron -e is Hi,j/rc
.
Electron Following a Circular Path In A Magnetic Field
Figure 3.
Then the angular velocity or tangential velocity of the electron can
also be defined by above equation (10), and angular frequency can be fs
is equation (11). This model equates vi,j to fs
, where vi,j relates to hyperspace electron velocity and fs
relates to hypetime t4Di time flow rate.
Examples: Fi=0.001 newton, vi=104
metres/second, mi = 9.11×10-31 kilogram, Hxi,j=
Hyi,j= Hzi,j=0.01000 metre, j = 2 location, rc
= 0.050000 metre. Speed of light in vacuum is c=2.99792×108 metres/second,
B=0.100 tesla. Electric frequency f=4.6×108 cycles per
second. The acceleration of an electron may perhaps be: a=dv/dt=(Fe/mi)ve
, or a=dv/dt=(Fe/mi)v,
according to the article "
Linear Acceleration Of A Mass". This
is when Fe/mi is large. Where mi
is the mass of the electron, and Fe is the electric force on
electron and ve is electron's velocity at acceleration time t.
Electric force on each electron may be defined as:
Fe=qV÷d, E=V÷d,
where q is the charge of the electron, and V is the acceleration
voltage to push or pull the electron with force Fe. Variable d
is the distance of the electrostatic metal plates than emit the electric field
intensity E. Examples: q=-1.60 ×10-27 coulomb, V=100
volts, d=0.001 metre. Then the velocity ve=vef
of the electron at acceleration time t=tf is in: dv/dt=(Fe/mi)ve;
dv(1/ve)= (Fe/mi)dt;
∫(1/ve )dv =∫(Fe/mi)dt;
Ln vef - Ln vei=(Fe/mi)[tf
- ti]; vef=e(Fe/mi)[tf -
ti].
This very fast final velocity vef makes the electron appear to be in
superposition. The Ne is the number of electrons in the
electric current I. Angular velocity of electron is: w=2πf=2πvef÷rc.
The fs∝vef . The symbol ∝ in this case
means proportional to. Measurement units: 1 V.= 1 volt, 2 V.=2 volts, 3 V.=3
volts; 1 A.=1 ampere, 2 A.=2 amperes, 3 A.=3 amperes; 1 C.=1 coulomb, 2 C.= 2
coulombs, 3 C.= 3 coulombs.
Examples: vei=10-16 m./nS. at start time ti=10-7
nS., tf=1 nS., nS.=nanosecond, e=2.718281828.,
1 nS.=10-9 S.,
1 pS.=10-13 S, Ne=1014 electrons,
S.=second, π= 3.141592654, λ= 65 metres. Velocity v=105
metes/second,
q=1.6022×10-19 C., V=+5 V., r=0.01 metre, S.=
second.
Measured wavelength of electromagnetic wave of electron in electric current, or
electric signal would be:
λ=c/f, fs/f=(ve/λ)/(c/λ)=ve/c;
for f>3×106 cycles per second, with hypertime frequency fs=1/t4Di.
Electron's physical velocity v∝f. The hypertime
frequency fs=b×f, where b is an
integer of very large magnitude. The b value is so large that small
changes in b or fs produces very little changes in f. Each
cycle of clock physical frequency f would have a set of fs
waves. The fs cycles would be in phase or resonance with f
so that the next cycle of f starts a new set of fs waves
or cycles as shown in figure 3c. For example: b=10100 (cycles
per second)/(cycle per second). The hypertime electric frequency fs would
have no electromagnetic energy and could only be detected by devices that
do not need energy such as a transistor or thermionic vacuum tube
(triode). The transistor input may only require electrical energy to overcome
electrical resistance R or Ri. Required
transistor input power may be: Pin=I2 ×R=V2
÷Ri=10-200 watt, where current I is the
input current into transistor, and V is the applied electrical voltage
to the transistor input resistance R. May not be able to detect
hypertronic frequency fs when electric transducers like
light emitting diodes that require electrical energy. Perhaps only nearly
stationary electrical charges like protons in semiconductors and
electricity can react to hypertronic frequency fs. Only the
results of fs can be detected after the hypertime frequency fs
generation was finished. Examples: V=0.6 V., I=10-4
A.
Graphs of fs Waves In Phase With f
Waves.
Figure 3c.
This model may work because electromagnetic waves can travel at
the speed of light c and instantaneously as explained in page "
Electromagnetic Field Propagation Velocity".
The angular speed can be 2πf at the speed of light c and 2πfs
which is nearly instantly.
The velocity of the electron in a loop of electrically conducting
wire using classical physics may be:
vL=(2qV/mi)1/2,
where V is the accelerating voltage on electron's charge q. The
length of the electrical loop is 2πr. If 2πfr>vL
a single cycle of frequency f cannot be completed within time
period 1/f. The the electrons of the electric current of frequency f
must go into superposition. At superposition the electrons appear to have an
instantaneous velocity ve. At this velocity ve,
the electrons may partially exists in hypertime as shown in figure 3b. In
figure 3b, the initiating physical electric pulse 2 is accelerated
or shortened in time in hypertime showing as pulse 3 in hypertime or local
hyperspace. With pulse 2 as shortened pulse 3, pulse 3 is also in
superposition in time as pulses 4 and 5. The digital signal 2 of figure 3b
shows a voltage of V= 5 V. at about 0.1 watt with a physical
frequency f.
Electrons In Superposition In
Space, And In Accelerated Time Or Hypertime

Figure 3b.
The frequency f then generates a hypertime frequency fs.
Basically, the physical electric speed f goes into fs in
hypertime or local hyperspace. Example: t4D2=1 second, t4D3=t4D2+10-200
S. in figure 3b.
If 2πfr=vL , the single cycle of f
can complete within time period 1/f and so fh=f.
This is stated in equation:
|
fh= |
|
2πfr=vL: f; |
|
|
||
|
|
Variable fh is the actual digital computer speed
or speed of byte calculations which may be equal to fs
or f. Hypertronic circuits or hyper electronics may involve
the nearly instantaneous transfer of electronic information as electrical
voltages like V at 0.01 watt within an electrical current.
Since we may not know how electromagnetism really works perhaps we need to set
aside much of the scientific information we read and see in
school textbooks and do these science experiments ourselves.
Then perhaps: ve=1÷(u4o×µ4o)1/2.
Local hypertime hyperspace electromagnetic permeability: u4o=uo×f÷fs,
Local hypertime hyperspace electrostatic permitting: µ4o=µo×f÷fs.
Then pseudo capacitance in hypertime hyperspace is perhaps: C4=µ4oµA÷dp,
where A is the surface area of the metal disks facing each other and dp
is the distance between these disks.
Electromagnetic permeability of free or vacuum space is uo=4π×10-7
tesla metre/ampere. Electrostatic permitting of free vacuum space is: µo=8.8542×10-12
farad2/(newton metre2 ). Examples: physical clock
frequency in a local three dimensional space-time f=
6.0×106 cycles per second, local hypertronic frequency fs=
1.×1027 iterations/second, A=0.0004 metre2, dp=0.00002
metre, µ=1 for vacuum dielectric between the metal disks. The electronic
oscillator may have a frequency of f, but the electrical signal or
information between electronic computer microscopic size memory may travel
instantaneously at ve .
A Parallel Universes Model For Hyper Electronics Operation
Another operation model of fast hyper electronic circuits or quasi quantum
computer is that there may be parallel universes that have copies of the
computer under test. The original copy of the computer in our present universe
may perform the first clock pulse of the computer instruction. Another copy of
the computer may perform the second clock pulse of the computer program, and
then a third copy of the computer in a third parallel universe does the next
clock pulse of the instruction. The original computer may then perhaps perform
the fourth clock cycle of the computer instruction. These cycles may be
repeated for the rest of the computer instructions until the computer program
completes. These copies of the computers would be closely interlinked between
each other via the local hyperspace. These clock pulses by each computer copy
would be handled nearly simultaneously and would appear to complete nearly
simultaneously in our three dimensional local space-time. Since these three or
more copies in the parallel universes Ui are basically
the same, these would recognize the instruction clock pulses of each other. The
instruction cycle done in one copy of the computer would also be done in the
copies. This makes the computer speeds fs appear to be very
fast. The electromagnetic fields of the electrons of the clock cycles would
perhaps be the communication medium between copies of the computers in parallel
time lines. The displacement vector in three dimensional space-time of such an
electron of the electricity that carries the clock pulse at a particular moment
of time can be: s=(sx,sy,sz,Ui).
Mathematical linear transformation from 4-space to 3-space is:
T: R4→R3:
s=(sx,sy,sz,Ui)→T(s)=(ux
sx, uy
sy, uz
sz);
for s=T(s).
In another model, there perhaps may be a single anti-matter parallel universe
beside our normal universe. An anti-matter universe would be nearly the same as
our own normal universe, except that the electrons are called positrons and
have a positive electric charge. An anti-matter copy of the computer or
hypertronic circuit may exists in the anti-matter universe. The original
computer in the normal universe performs the first clock cycle 1b in figure 6b
of the computer instruction. Then the anti-matter copy of the computer in the
parallel anti-matter universe would perform the second clock cycle of the
computer instruction nearly immediately. Then the ordinary copy of the computer
in the normal universe performs the third clock pulse 3b in figure 6b of the
computer instructions nearly immediately. The cycle of each performing the
calculations would repeat until the computer program completes. The normal
computer and the anti-matter computer would be closely linked via the local
hyper space. They are basically the same; what occurs in another may reflect in
the copy. One copy of the computer 1 would see some of the clock pulses already
done that was not done by itself, and copy 1 would proceed with the next clock
pulse. These three or more clock pulses of the instruction would occur nearly
simultaneously in normal time. This causes the computer speed to be a very fast fs.
In one copy of the computer, the electron can be at a particular local s=0.02
metre in the computer, and would be relocated nearly instantaneously to another
location s=0.001 metre in the same computer by the anti-matter
computer in the anti-matter parallel universe. This perhaps will only occur
only for electrical clock pulses that last less than 10-6 second,
because the hyperspace window that allows the anti-matter computer to
communicate with the normal computer copy lasts only for a short time. A
microscopic size portal or opening in local three dimensional space-time where
the electromagnetic signals between anti-matter universe of computer and normal
universe of computer may only last for a short window of time. This short
window or period of time may perhaps be 1/fmax. This sharing
of electromagnetic information between copies of computers may perhaps only
occur with small subatomic particles like electrons of electrical current flow
in hypertronic circuits, because larger masses would take too much electrical
energy to travel between parallel universes. This model mainly applies for
short electrical pulses like computer clock pulses that lasts only for a short
time. The electric signal would finish before the next clock pulse runs.
Hypertonic calculations may perhaps occur in other parallel universes Ui
where there are other soft or virtual copies of the computer; the
calculations are only detected in three dimensional local space-time in the
normal initial computer when the calculation results halts for at
least 1/(4fb) or 1/fmax in
the soft computer copies. When the normal comuter in normal local
three dimensional space-time detects the resultsthat has a duration of at
least 1/fmax, it collects
the results and restarts the calculations. The start of the calculations
may perhaps then go hypertronic speed fs
again. The fmax could
also be the maximum electrical frequency that the transistors in the
computer can detect of local three dimensional space-time. Calculation
halt delay tde>1/fmax
. Imaginary examples:
s=0.02 metre, sx=0.001
metre →, sy=0.01
metre ↑, sz=0.005
metre ,
Ui=our own parallel
universe 1, Ui=||Ui||,
data bus speed fb=4000000 bytes/second, ux=1
metre/metre, uy=1 metre/metre, uz
=1 metre/metre, tde=1.01/(4fb ).
Superposition of Electromagnetic Wave States
Model, Or Electromagnetic Multiple Forms Model
Scientific models of electromagnetism may be incorrect or partially
incorrect. To avoid narrow assumptions on electromagnetism, there is a
multiple forms of electromagnetism model called the electromagnetic multiple
forms model. There is an unusual model of electromagnetism that says that
the true form of an electromagnetic wave in a vacuum is unknown or
indefinite until it is detected by an atom or measuring device. The measuring
device or
observer(s) partially determines the science experiment results. This
is like the anti-realist point of view. The anti-realist ideology states that
there is no physical reality other than the reality we make
in our own minds. The realist position states that reality such as
electromagnetism and gravity is independent of the human mind. Can take a
middle point of view between the anti-realist and realist point of views and
assume that some parts of reality such as electromagnetism may perhaps be
affected by the human observer by a small degree. The electromagnetic wave
can take one of many forms in this electromagnetic multiple form model. The
electromagnetic wave may exist in multiple forms at the same time until it is
detected. This is superposition of electromagnetic states model where the state Ψn,i
( ) of the electromagnetic wave in a vacuum is not known until it is
measured or detected by matter (atom). The electromagnetic photon may exists as
a particle or as a wave. Someone could detect a photon as a particle using the
photo-electric effect in a photo tube. The photon appears as a particle
because it moves or knocks an electron from an atom of metal in the
photo tube
The photon's velocity in a local vacuum space-time may not be determined
until someone measures it. If we observe an electromagnetic wave's voltage
amplitude and frequency on an electronic oscilloscope screen we
cannot detect the velocity of the electromagnetic wave.
The polarization of the photon wave may not be known until the
polarization is measured with a polaroid. The photon wave polarization can be
with 45 degrees of the polaroid's orientation.
If we do not observe the behavior or form an electromagnetic wave
it may partially exists in hypertime and local hyperspace until it is
detected on its completion of its travel.
The sine wave frequency of the electromagnetic wave in a vacuum may also
be indefinite until it is detected. The detect frequency would also depend on
the reviving antenna dimensions. Can transmit a radio wave with a hertzian
dipole called the transmitter antenna that may be about 3 metres long. The
radio wave would be about 0.1 watt at 10 volts-peak with a fundamental
frequency f of about
5 megahertz=f. The same radio signal would have some harmonic
frequencies 3f/2, 5f/4, 4f/3=ha and
others with similar amplitudes. A receiving coil antenna with 2 to 6 loops
at about 0.5 metre diameter which is tuned to about 2f radio frequency
can be used as a receiver antenna. This receiver antenna can work as an
electric or radio frequency multiplier when placed a few centimetres away
from the transmitter antenna. The receiver antenna turns the radio wave
signal into an electric signal with the electric signal then detected with an
electronic oscilloscope. The electric frequency from the receiver antenna could
depend and the receive antenna's length of its wire loops. This
indicates that the receive antenna can be an electric frequency multiplier. The
many electric sine wave frequencies of the transmitter antenna could induce
many faster electric frequencies in the receiver loop antenna. Since the
resultant radio frequency in receiver loop can be a few of many,
the frequencies of the radio waves between both antennas in the vacuum could be
indefinite.
With this scientific model of electromagnetism an electromagnetic
wave or photon when in a vacuum and in isolation from other atoms may have
many different forms simultaneously until it takes one form when it is
detected. This idea of an electromagnetic wave or photon being at an indefinite
state or superposition of states when it is not being observed or
not detected is called the superposition of electromagnetic states
model. The symbol Ψz,i ( ) represents the wave
function of the ith photon at state z or zth form. The
electromagnetic field or photon can take one form z or perhaps be a
combination of some of the forms z. Equation (2z) has wave
function Ψ,z,i ( ) matched to a set of values,
measured values and equations defining the photon depending on state z:
| Ψz,i( )= | z=1: {vp=c=s/(tr-tt)}; z=2: {vp =1×10-1000 m./S.=?, V=Vm×sin(wt)}; z=3: {E=h f=Wo+Ek, Ek=(mi/2) ve2}; |
|
| z=4: {λ=c/f,
tde>1/fmax}; |
||
| z=5: {vp=1/10-1000
m./S.= ?, fs=b×f , f>fmax=4×106Hz.=1/Δtmax, [~(~A & Y2)=Y1 , ~(B &Y1) =Y2,0through ~(B &Y1) =Y2,m-1], [~(A v Y2)=Y1, ~(B vY1)=Y2], {m| m (2z) . |
||
For example with form z=1, the electromagnetic photon
travels at speed c in absolute vacuum space. As form z=2, the
electromagnetic wave is detected as a sine wave voltage V on a cathode
ray tube screen of an electronic oscilloscope, and you may not be able to
measure speed c of electromagnetic waves with this detection
method. For example, as electromagnetic form z=5, the
electromagnetic waves as electrons in an electric current can
perhaps be detected as hypertronic speeds fs. These
hypertronic speeds fs could only be detected after completion
of the computer program by using digital electronic memory defined by
boolean algebra equations: ~(~A & Y2)=Y1, ~(B
&Y1) =Y2. Work function for
photoelectric effect is Wo=2.28 electron volts for sodium.
Photon propagation velocity vp, Planck's constant h=6.63×10-34
joule second. The s is distance travel by radar signal between time tt
and tr. Time tt is transmit time and tr
is signal received time. Examples for equations (2z): s=20 metres, tt=10-7
second, 1/f=t=1/f, Vm=10 volts-peak at
10-8 watt, 1<Iint<1012 stars.
Symbol & is for logical bitwise "and" gate, symbol ~ is for logical bitwise
"not" gate. Digital signal voltage VS= +5 V. at 0.1
watt. If A=1 bit, then Y1=0 bit, ~A=B,
and Y2=1=~Y1. 1 bit=5 V.-peak at 0.02 watt,
0 bit= 0.1 V.-peak at 0.00000001 watt, x=3 coins. I int
in equation (2z) is an integer. The f fs.
The dashed arrow symbol
means: partially implies, sometimes implies or mostly implies. Then
f fs means:
f sometimes or mostly implies fs .
Superposition In Time
Superposition is when a subatomic particle like an electron or
photon appears to be able to exist at more than one place at the same
time. In superposition in time, the first electromagnetic wave or electron
wave sends copies of its self as hyper-electromagnetic waves into the
recent past and future as shown in figure 5. The second wave or cycle also does
the same. Then the following waves do the same. The waves and
hyper-electromagnetic waves then appear to exists in one or several
moments of time nearly at the same time. Then the waves that do not violate
casualty or are in chronological order in a local three dimensional
space-time are detected by the computer circuit. Casualty violation is when a
present electron interferes with its past self so that this present
electron cannot achieve this time travel .Only electromagnetic wave events of
the past that permit a smooth flow of events in time come to exist in
three dimensional space-time. Then local hyper-electromagnetic waves
in parallel universes are perhaps only local potential realities.
From the article "
Possible Heterodyning Of Light Photons Through Milliseconds Of Time"
.
Figure 4.
Figure
5: Superposition Of Some Electromagnetic Waves Over Milliseconds Of Time.
The electromagnetic waves within time period trg=
0.01 second may be superimposed along time. This may indicate that these
electromagnetic waves with frequency fw=109 cycles
per second at wattage levels W= 0.00001 watt within time
period trg occurs simultaneously within time period trg at
least in hyperspace. Each electromagnetic wave would have the other
adjacent electromagnetic waves superimposed on it that exists within time
period trg. The electromagnetic waves can be superimposed
or in superpositioned on the first front electromagnetic wave near the
start of trd and can be completed or operate then. Then
the next packet of electromagnetic waves follow and do the same actions. This
way electromagnetic waves or pulses can be compressed in time from t3Di
into t4Di. The electromagnetic waves traveling though
time cannot be detected by the usual means like with an electronic
oscilloscope. It may be detected by its influence on ordinary electromagnetic
waves. The amplitudes V (at 0.1 watt peak, and f=106 cycles
per second) of the superposition of waves of figure 5 may reduce with
times further from the present time ti as shown in
figure 6. Shortest needed time period Tm=trg/2.
Example: Tm=0.001 second, 1/f<Tm/5.
Amplitudes Of The
Superposition Of Waves Of Figure 5 Through Time t
3Di
Figure 6.
If an electric pulse duration Δt3Di>trg the
hypertime electric frequency fs may not occur. Δt3Di=10-4
second. Only the electromagnetic and electric waves that are in superposition
that do not violate casualty, or are in chronological order in three
dimensional space-time are detected or play out in three dimensional
space-time in the computer circuit. This may be the most likely scientific
model of these models for the production of fast hypertime electric
frequencies fs .
Can try to use this superposition in time model with the parallel
universes model above. In this model, a copies 1, 2 and 3 of computer in
parallel universe or parallel time lines Ui=1, Ui=2
and Ui=3 respectively may exist. Figure 6b may help
illustrate how copies of computers in parallel universes may interact. These
quasi quantum computer copies would be linked via the local hyperspace. They
are very similar and would be considered the same computer. The original
computer 1 in our normal parallel universe Ui=universe1
does the first clock pulse 1b of its machine code instruction in figure 6b.
Pulse 1b would initiate and perform the operation of a portion of the machine
code instruction. The computer copy 2 in parallel universe Ui=universe
2 also receives the results of pulse 1b made by the computer copy 1. It
(computer 2) sees pulse 1b already done, but may not know how it was done. Then
this computer copy 2 in parallel universe Ui=universe
2 immediately does the next pulse 2b of the computer instruction in figure 6b.
The computer copy 3 in parallel time line Ui= universe
3 detects pulse 2b and 1b also and sees these pulses already done. Computer
copy 3 than does the third pulse 3b of the computer instruction immediately in
figure 6b. The computer copy 1 would also detect pulse 3b already done.
Computer copy 1 may then do pulse 4b of the instruction immediately. The other
two copies 1 and 2 of the computer would also see the pulse 4b somehow already
done. The this cycle may repeat again to perform the other program's binary
machine code instructions until the computer program stops. Since the four
pulses 1b, 2b, 3b, and 4b in figure 6b may be nearly superposition in time they
could be processed nearly simultaneously by each copy of the quasi quantum
computer in the parallel time lines Ui. The pulses 1b,
2b, 3b, 4b, etcetera would be completed at a very fast speed fs.
Some Computer Instruction Pulses Superposition In Time And In Parallel
Time Lines

Figure 6b.
To prove this hypertime model or partially prove
the electromagnetic multiple form model, may perhaps use the hypertime
immersed computer also called the semi quantum computer, hypertronic computer
or quasi quantum computer. This very fast computer is called a quasi quantum
computer because it may have fast calculation speeds. A quasi quantum computer
would have similar calculation speed performances as a quantum computer would
have if a quantum computer works, except the quasi quantum computer uses a
group of particles like electricity instead of just one particle
orientation to represent a binary bit. A quasi quantum computer is a hyper
electronic circuit. The superposition of electrons or electric signals in
space and time may be the best model to explain the operation of hyper
electronic circuits. The quasi quantum computer calculations appear to happen
at the same time in three dimensional space. Figures 6c may help explain
this. The first pulse "a" of the computer byte starts at time t0=0.00 second
in figures 6c(a) and 6c(b). Figure 6c(b) is figure 6c(a) expanded over time
graphically.
Figure 6c.
The 16 bit address bus of a microprocessor integrated circuit figure
8 appears to be pulsing with 11111111,111111112 most
of the time when measured or seen via an electronic oscilloscope. The
addresses 00000000,000000002 to 11111111,111111112 which
are not visible may perhaps occur at the same time in the local three
dimensional space. The section "Unproven
Experiment E: Test Circuit With The Z180 Microprocessor " shows other
uncertain experiments. The control lines or address bits are A0
through
Am-1, with {m| m
Iint, m≥2}, integers Iint=2 through 10000.
Bits Am-1 through A0 form a
binary word A a set of bits. Bit A 0 (on far
right in above binary numbers) would be the least significant bit of the
control lines. The hypertronic speed fs would depend an the
number of clock pulses that can fit with time period 2Tm, so
hypertronic speed depends on clock speed f. The hypertronic speed fs also
depends on the number range 2m-1 that the hypertronic transistor
have to detect. The the hypertronic speed should be at least: fs=2Tm
f (2m-1), m=16 bits (electrical control
lines). The electric signal bytes must be distinguished by an address byte A=Ai
with at least two bits or electric lines. The faster the clock frequency f
the closer the byte or word Ai signals are in
time and so the greater the degree of superposition of the Ai
words, so that perhaps:
fs=f ÷((1/∆tmax)-f), where
0.0 pulses/second <f ≤(1/∆tmax), for subscript
i=1 to 2m words. Where where all bytes or binary words Ai are
in superposition when 1/∆tmax≤f . This superposition
of electrons (electricity) in space and time model for hypertronic computer may
be the best model in this title. Virtual computer information in
figure 6e is massless and perhaps need not travel at the speed of
light c, but faster.
Virtual Computer Machine
Figure 6e.
Some other tests seems to be able to be done with java
computer language servlets on a Linux server computer revealed next and an
8085 microprocessor in experiment G. This model may work because
electromagnetic waves can travel at the speed of light c and
instantaneously as explained in page "
Electromagnetic Field Propagation Velocity".
The angular speed can be 2ωf at the speed of light c and 2ωfs
which is nearly instantly.
Experiment A: Linux Server And AMD Athlon Computer
Tests
The AMD Athlon processor is an i686 type of digital circuit or
processor. The i686 processors which can be from different
manufacturers are based on the Intel 80686 processor. It can be
the central processor unit of a Von Neumann type of computer architecture
found in desktop computers. Figure 4 may show the block diagram of a basic
Von Neumann computer architecture.
Block Diagram Of A Simple Basic Von Neumann Computer Architecture
Figure 4.
Time flow rate in hypertime can be much faster. The fast pulsing
electricity with frequency f in a processor circuit like
the AMD Athlon processor may partially exist in hypertime t4Di. When
the electric pulses with frequency f falls into hypertime that is between
normal three dimensional times t3Di, the rate of time
flow of the electric pulses becomes faster to fs. Then
the faster computer clock speed of a computer with its electricity partially
existing in hypertime may be: fs= 1/t4Di=1/t3Di2.
Example: t3Di=5×10-9 second, f=1/t3Di.We
normally only experience or notice frequency f in three dimensional
space-time. Electrons that are much lighter in weight may perhaps undergo
existence in hypertime and accelerated speed much easier than
large masses like a copper penny. At the quantum level at which electrons or
subatomic particles are, subatomic particles may behave differently than
large objects like copper pennies as a whole do. Subatomic particles like
electrons may quantum tunnel as the article "
Homopolar Electric Dynamos" may
indicate. When an electron quantum tunnels, it seems to disappear from one
region and re-appear in another region of space as the particle travels. This
quantum tunelling ability may perhaps permit electrons to travel quickly
in hypertime with frequency fs.
Program Calculation Completion Times
Certain computer codes required specific completion times depending
partially on the size of the program.
The machine code quantity generated by the assembly language should be as short
as possible. Java server pages language on a Linux/Unix server seems
to perform the codes 4b
shown below to over 1000000 times faster than
active server pages.net language on a Windows server on the same server
computer. The code will finish within 5 seconds on Linux (Unix
based) server operating system. This is so if the Unix operating
system does not insert any codes within the inner loop, and the Linux version
can be trusted, is working, when the Linux/Unix does not do to many processor
interruptions, and when the Linux/Unix server is not to busy. For more
predictable results use the Java servlet language within a Linux server operating
system software. The active server pages.net software was
perhaps doing some code checking, virtual memory to physical
memory location control and perhaps had larger machine code
quantity than Unix software that prolonged to code completion. The
following list (2d) are test or source codes of some of the
test programs of table 2 (unavailable indefinitely) below also
with java language source codes shown in same table 2.
Computer Processing Speed fs Test Source Codes
Codes 4b
Codes 4c4
Codes 4c
Codes 4c2
Codes 4c3
Codes4c4
Codes 4d
Codes 6b,
Codes 7b.
(2d)
The N= 100000000 -(number of operations x2 within the outer
"for" loop). There is a code that performs the speed test using
"for" loop iterations. The speed of code 4b was discovered by
serendipity. Code 4b test page:
../servlet/check
(place cursor in url bar and press "Enter" a few times if pages
does not show within 18 seconds and reload serlvet "check") . Other
test codes 4b4 also worked, but it
takes a longer time to complete. Test 30 codes 9 in table
2 which may take a few tries to complete shows best experiment
at this time.
When codes 6b
was written in assembly language in Windows XP with McAfee firewall
program it performed slower than in the above java server pages
code on Unix/Linux operating system.
Testing codes 6b shows the Turbo Assembler Language version of the above code
4b that ran on Windows XP in a desk top computer. The java server pages code of
codes 4b than ran on Unix server still ran over 2200 times faster than
codes 6b. Making the machine code as efficient as possible is called code
optimization. May be able to make the computer program efficient by minimizing
the number of machine code in the computer program and by choosing the
appropriate machine codes. To minimum the machine codes can try ro use as many
microprocessor registers as possible as shown in code 4d before running the
loops of codes 4b. Codes 7b
is similar to codes 6b.
Table 2 shows computer speeds fs versus computer operating
system software and language compilers for 32 bit words ( x and y numbers)
only on a 32 bit processor circuit.
Computer speed fs is in units of operations per second
or iterations per second. Each repeat of the "for" loop or increment of x
or y in codes 4b is an iteration. The fs speeds in table
2 can also be number of "for" loop iterations per second of many of the
demonstration codes of table 2 (unavailable indefinitely) . Table 2
shows the codes that were used to test the corresponding computer speed and the
programming language of this code. The compiler brand were the programs to turn
the codes into machine language codes for the computer to run. Bios and
hardware utility programs y are the computer start programs that are
in the read only memory integrated circuits that come with the main circuit
board. the fast speeds only shows well with the above simple computer test
codes, but the data does seems to show the existence of hypertime electric
frequency fs. The java servlet demonstration programs of
table 2 were difficult to start. If some of the demonstration programs in
table 2 do not work within 15 to 60 seconds, place the cursor in the url
bar after the url and press "Enter", or click on link 2
to 5 times at 5 to 8 second intervals with lower (green colored)
progress indicating bar working. This may avoid interference on the java
virtual machine by the operating system software, by the java virtual machine
and the hypertext transfer protocol (http). Program 4c (Codes
4c) should take 10 to 35 seconds or in about 3 minutes to
complete usually after pressing the "Enter" key, button or
link again. Program 4c3 (Codes 4c3) usually takes about 10
seconds or 3 minutes to complete. Programs 4c2 and 4c3 are difficult to
make work immediately. If program 4c3 does not finish in about 5
minutes, retry the link again; place cursor in url bar and press "Enter" or
press link four times at 4 to 6 second intervals. For demonstration
program 8 in table 2, may need to click link two times and let
green progress bar below re-run at 10 to 20 second intervals. Program
8 should finish at third or fourth re-run. Need to shake (remove) the
Linux operating system and Tomcat server program interruptions from the
java servlet to get hypertronic frequency fs to show.
Test codes 9 through code 9f of test 30 have the best results,
and may take about 4 to 8 minutes each to complete
after restarting to progress bar two to five times (with 5 to 8 second
intervals between pairs of mouse clicks). If the tests does not show in 8
minutes, try re-running the progress bar again. With code 9g having
the best result which sometimes does not work. Test code 9 generates three
sums that can only be completed if the program goes through its fs
iterations using an internet viewer. Test code 9b is similar to test code
9 except tester needs to record the results and repeat the test code 9b.
Test code 9b has 6.5×1028 iterations which shows that much of the 4
minute delay for the test program to finish may be produced by the Linux
operating system itself. Test code 9c made just to confuse the java
virtual machine is similar to tests codes 9 and 9b. Test 30 codes
produces sum results co, co2, and/or co3 that can only be calculated by going
through the iterations x, y and z. Iterations are x×y×z iterations≈fs
×(time2-time1) in test programs. For tests 30 through 34 try clicking the
link three times at about 6 second intervals with each time the
progress bar below running. Tests 31 through 34 codes may work
within a minute after running the progress bar twice. Using the new
Mozilla 1.7.13 internet viewer program may produce quicker
viewing results for some of the test
codes . If the java virtual machine
software makes the co, co2, and co3 results secretly, then it must have a
list of numbers somewhere in the java compiler for these. It cannot make the
final results of co, co2, and co3 at random. Can try many different values
of initial co, co2, and co3 to test this list of numbers if the list
exists. This is done in tests 3x (not available yet) in table 2. Can try
to reverse the calculations of the co, co2, and co3 results to obtain
their initial values. If the calculations could be reversed, this would be an
indication that perhaps the java virtual machine software does not have
this secret list of numbers and the results would perhaps be genuine.
Table 2. Computer Operating Speeds Versus Operating System Softwares And
Computer Types
|
Tests: |
fs |
operating system softwares: |
computer languages: |
code compilers: |
processors: |
test codes |
demonstration source codes: |
internet server softwares: |
test computer types: |
input/output circuits and programs active: |
y |
|
1 |
9.2×1030 |
Red Hat Linux (kernel 2.69-42.03ELsmp) |
Java (java servlet) |
Java (year 2006/2007) |
i686 |
4b |
Apache 1.3.37 Unix |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone connection |
unknown |
|
|
2 |
1.8×1031 |
Linux |
Java (java servlet) |
Java (year 2006/2007) in Windows XP |
|
4b, 4b5 |
Unix based server |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
unknown |
|
|
3 |
|
Linux |
Java |
Java (year 2006/2007) |
|
4c |
|
Unix based server |
internet server |
magnetic disk, telephone |
unknown |
|
9 |
5.8×106 |
Red Hat Linux (kernel 2.69-42.03ELsmp) |
Perl (server side script) |
Perl 5.8.7 |
i686 |
|
Apache 1.3.37 Unix |
internet server |
magnetic disk, telephone |
unknown |
|
|
10 |
7.7×104 |
Linux |
PHP language |
PHP 5 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
|
|
Unix based |
server |
magnetic disk, telephone |
unknown |
|
11 |
3.0×108
|
Fedora Core (Linux, 2006/2007) |
C |
Gnu Compiler Collection (gcc) |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
4b |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, magnetic disks, audio, #include <stdio.h> |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
12 |
|
Window XP |
Java (Java servlet) |
j2sdk1.4.0 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
|
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
13 |
|
Windows XP |
Java (java application) |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
|
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
14 |
2×108 |
Windows XP |
C |
Metrowerks Codewarrior 5.0.0.951 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
4b |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio, firewall program, dos |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
15 |
5×108 |
Windows XP |
Java |
Java j2sdk1.4.0 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
4b |
|
|
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio, firewall |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
16 |
1×109 |
Windows server |
C# |
Windows server |
i686
|
4b |
|
Windows Internet Information Service |
internet server |
magnetic disk, telephone |
unknown |
|
17 |
5.2×108 |
Windows XP |
C# |
Visual Studio.Net |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
4b |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio, firewall |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
18 |
10000 |
Windows XP |
Assembly |
Borland Turbo Assembler 5 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
7b |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio, firewall |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
19 |
2.7×108 |
Windows XP |
C |
Metroweks Codewarrior 5.0.0.951 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
4b |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio, dos (#include <stdio.h>) |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
20 |
2.×108 |
Windows XP |
Java |
Java j2sdk1.4.0 (Command Prompt), Metroweks Codewarrior 5.0.0.951 |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+
|
4b |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
21 |
3.×106 |
Windows XP |
JavaScript |
Internet Explorer |
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
4b |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio |
Award (Phoenix), QDI |
|
22 |
|
|
java server pages standard tag library |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
2.×1045 |
Linux |
Java (java servlet) |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 in Windows XP |
i686
|
|
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone connection |
unknown |
|
|
24 |
5.4×1054 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 in Windows XP |
i686 |
|
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
unknown |
|
|
25 |
6.1×1072 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 (in Windows XP) |
i686 |
|
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
unknown |
|
|
26 |
2.1×108 |
Windows XP |
java servlet |
|
AMD Athlon XP 1800+ |
4c5 |
|
none |
desktop |
video, keyboard, mouse, disks, audio |
|
|
27 |
|
Linux |
java servlet |
|
|
4c5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
3.50277×10105 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 in Windows XP |
i686 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
unknown |
||
|
29 |
3.2439×10133 |
Linux |
java servlet |
|
|
8b |
Tomcat |
internet server |
|
|
|
|
30 |
3.4×1028 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
i686 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
unknown |
||
|
31 |
6.8122×10142 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
i686 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
unknown |
||
|
32 |
1.4×10152 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
i686 |
11 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
|
|
|
33 |
3.0×10161 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
i686 |
12 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
|
|
|
34 |
1.3×10180 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
i686 |
13 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
|
|
|
35 |
2.78×10189 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
i686 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
|
||
|
36 |
1.2×10208 |
Linux |
java servlet |
j2sdk1.4.0, Forte For Java 3.0 |
i686 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, telephone |
|
||
|
37 |
2×108 |
i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3, gnu |
Gnu C |
Gnu, (with bash shell 2.05b.0(1)) |
i386
|
|
Tomcat |
internet server |
magnetic storage disk, internet connection |
unknown |
|
|
38 |
2×108 |
i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3, gnu |
Java application |
Java 3.1.10 in same computer |
i386 |
|
17 |
Tomcat |
internet server |
|
|
|
39 |
400 |
i386-redhat-linux/3.2.3, gnu |
Bourne Shell script |
Bourne shell (Unix (in same computer)) |
i386 |
|
Tomcat |
internet server |
|
|
QDI is Quality Design Innovation
software, dos is disk operating system software.
The first result of test 1 is similar to a second Linux server
test 2. Test 3 of java servlet on a Unix based server took about 14 seconds to
complete.
From table 2 there can be seen that assembly language of test
12 on the personal desktop computer is the slowest. The
McAfee Firewall, Quick Clean and VirusScan programs in Windows XP were
slowing down this assembly language of test 18 and in test 14.
The AMD Athlon XP 1800+ processor has an actual
applied clock speed f or data bus physical speed f
between 4.65 to 5. megahertz when seen with an electronic
digital oscilloscope from it, or f less then 50 megahertz
when measured with an analog oscilloscope. The byte access time from request to
main memory to processor input would be about 195 nanoseconds (5.1
megahertz). The main memory (ram) bandwidth would be at least 800
megabytes per second. This means that about 4.65 megabytes of binary
information would flow in the data bus in 1 second. This clock signal of f
has also weaker harmonic frequencies in the 133 to 200 megahertz
range. The Windows XP software says that this processor has 1530 megahertz
processing speed which is 1530/5 times faster than the physical clock
speed f= 5 megahertz. The processor speed can only be as fast as the
data bus speed. How can a data bus physical speed of f=5. megahertz
(megabytes/second) produce an iteration speed of fs=5.2×108
iterations/second? In test 18, the Windows operating system has severely
limited the speed fs of the assembly language. The
Windows server in test 16 of pre-compiled C# language that was on the
server computer of test 2 produced a slow speed fs than
test 2. This may perhaps indicate that the speed of Windows server
and C# machine code was deliberately set to realistic appearing value
by the Windows group. The C# language on a Windows server computer
did not show the fast speeds fs which may indicate that the
server computer speed may have been set, controlled or limited
(pegged) to f with the server's clock since the Windows and Linux
server hardwares are nearly identical. Only some of the java servlet codes
(syntax) of table 2 source codes could work at hypertronic speeds fs.
This may be intentionally or unintentionally by most computer makers. If
intentionally, this secret knowledge of hypertronic speeds fs
may already be out there. If unintentionally, these computer makers
do not know how to make or obtain hypertonic speeds fs
in ordinary electronic computer circuits and speed fs
was discovered by happy accident.
To test the table 2 fast computer speeds, the experimenter
may need a separate server computer or need to build his or her
own computer without video output and keyboard input circuits used by computer.
May need to make an own processor made from transistor-transistor-logic
integrated circuits so that you can have control over the processor behavior.
Can attempt to connect an internet server computer to a desktop computer and
run the test codes on this server computer. The test codes must not be involved
and slowed in speed with computer input and output operations. The test codes
must not wait for video circuit and mouse circuit operations to continue
running.
The Linux/Unix operating system softwares in table 2 were used for
testing. When desiring to use a Linux software, need to check if the Linux
brand will work with the computer, and its new components like modem
and optical disk drive. In tests 19 and 20, the code 4b speeds fs
even with no firewall program depends on the compiler brand also and
dos.
Tests 9 and 10 using Perl and PHP (Hypertext
Preprocessor) languages have much slower speeds fs than
in test 2 even though they were run on the same server computer. With
these codes, the Perl language was about 75 times faster than PHP language.
Some server scripting languages seems to be faster than others depending on
program codes, file size and programing tasks. Windows scripts seem to get
slower with larger tasks and file searches.
The Fedora Core (Linux, 2006/2007) desktop software was not well
supported and sometimes does not fully work and may be difficult to get
fully working.
From table 2 there can be seen that monitoring programs like
McAfee Firewall, Quick Clean or VirusScan, or Norton Antivirus can reduce
the code completion time by over a billion times even when disabled. These
monitoring programs need to be un-installed from the computer to obtain
the fast speeds s shown in table 2. The number of processor interruptions
that these third party monitoring programs do per second have to be
reduced by 10 to a 1000 times. Test 28 of above table 2 shows a speed of fs=
350,000 googol iterations per second if the java servlet did not
deceive. A googol is a large number which is a 1 followed by 100
zeros: 1 googol=10100=10 duotrigintillion. Number 1 decillion=1033.
There is a possibility that electricity exists in hypertime. We
cannot see the speed fs on an electronic oscilloscope screen,
because the oscilloscope sweep rate currents have the same hypertime frequency fs
or time t4Di. Then the clock frequency of the computer is: f=fs
×t4Di. In the above experiments, the fs
numbers changed after the second and third reloads or "Refresh" of the servlet.
This would indicate that java servlet goes through the iterations before
showing the numbers which means that the pre-compiled servlets on a Linux
server does run at the hyperspeeds or hypertime frequencies fs. Programs
with many variable arrays like xx[2] do not show the speed fs
on the i686 server computer. The speeds fs only show with
some code types like codes 4b that use fast speeds f . The Linux
servers may not have a separate slow time clock that is used to time
the interrupt the java servlets or video circuits to interfere with the
java serlvets.
Test 36 and 37 were done on this same server computer but
a different computer than other tests, and did not show hypertronic
calculations speeds fs . This indicates that the hypertonic
speed capability depends also on the computer circuit board brand. Some
Linux servers seem to have hypertronic calculation speeds, and to protect
the hypertronic server computer existence and manufacturer, the hypertronic
server computer brands will not be mentioned here.
Did not have much control over the remote server computer of table
2 experiments, so the above experiments did not produce 100 % certainty of
success. The behavior of the above server computers were a
little unpredictable. The AMD Athlon (i686) processor does not seem
to work fast enough for some java servlet code statement types like variable
arrays. To this test computer speeds fs need to
construct a computer with computer's software from nothing or "from the ground
up" by one self. Can use digital circuits to test speeds fs.
The digital computer circuits may be partially immersed in hypertime which
circuits can be called hypertronics, hyper electronics, or
digital hypertronics. This is with fs counts
independent of f. The applied clock speed f in the
processor and detected by an analog oscilloscope need not be the
same as the processing speed fs that can be observed using
the above test codes. The next tests involves testing the speeds fs
of other commercial computers.
The later test using decade counter as a hypertronic circuit using light
emitting diodes as digital output was also done, but did not show a hypertronic
frequency fs . Experiment G in table of contents seems to
have hypertronic speed fs results.
February 2007, section updated on: 27-02-2008.
To next page.